We are currently migrating Bugzilla to GitHub issues.
Any changes made to the bug tracker now will be lost, so please do not post new bugs or make changes to them.
When we're done, all bug URLs will redirect to their equivalent location on the new bug tracker.

Bug 3381 - Screen corruption after alt+tab
Summary: Screen corruption after alt+tab
Status: RESOLVED ABANDONED
Alias: None
Product: SDL
Classification: Unclassified
Component: video (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0.1
Hardware: x86_64 Windows 10
: P2 normal
Assignee: Sam Lantinga
QA Contact: Sam Lantinga
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-07-03 05:36 UTC by DLaboratory
Modified: 2018-08-06 21:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
screen capture (79.73 KB, image/png)
2016-07-03 05:36 UTC, DLaboratory
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description DLaboratory 2016-07-03 05:36:33 UTC
Created attachment 2522 [details]
screen capture

Alt+tabing works fine first 1-3 times, but then the issue begins to occur. After the user switches back, the screen is corrupted.
Comment 1 Philipp Wiesemann 2016-07-07 19:08:47 UTC
Is this only with SDL 2.0.1 (as selected above) or still with SDL 2.0.4?
Comment 2 DLaboratory 2016-07-08 12:42:44 UTC
(In reply to Philipp Wiesemann from comment #1)
> Is this only with SDL 2.0.1 (as selected above) or still with SDL 2.0.4?

Yes, still happening with SDL 2.0.4.
Comment 3 Sam Lantinga 2017-08-12 01:16:59 UTC
Can you attach a test program or a link to the source for this program so we can reproduce it here?

Thanks!
Comment 4 Ryan C. Gordon 2018-08-06 21:20:18 UTC
Hello, and sorry if you're getting dozens of copies of this message by email.

We are closing out bugs that appear to be abandoned in some form. This can happen for lots of reasons: we couldn't reproduce it, conversation faded out, the bug was noted as fixed in a comment but we forgot to mark it resolved, the report is good but the fix is impractical, we fixed it a long time ago without realizing there was an associated report, etc.

Individually, any of these bugs might have a better resolution (such as WONTFIX or WORKSFORME or INVALID) but we've added a new resolution of ABANDONED to make this easily searchable and make it clear that it's not necessarily unreasonable to revive a given bug report.

So if this bug is still a going concern and you feel it should still be open: please feel free to reopen it! But unless you respond, we'd like to consider these bugs closed, as many of them are several years old and overwhelming our ability to prioritize recent issues.

(please note that hundred of bug reports were sorted through here, so we apologize for any human error. Just reopen the bug in that case!)

Thanks,
--ryan.