You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported in version: 2.0.4 Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, ARM
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2016-06-21 18:26:24 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
Created attachment 2504
Changeset implements the use of SDL_RPI_VIDEO_LAYER environment variable
On a RaspberryPI, it might become convenient to specify the Dispmanx layer SDL uses.
Currently, it is hardcoded to be 10000 to sit above most applications.
This can be specially useful when integrating other graphical apps and frameworks like OMXplayer, QT5 etc.. in order to have more flexibility on their Z-order.
The attached changeset allows to export SDL_RPI_VIDEO_LAYER with the desired layer number.
On 2016-06-21 19:56:18 +0000, Alex Szpakowski wrote:
This seems like it should be implemented as a SDL_Hint rather than a plain environment variable. SDL hints can be set either via an environment variable or through the SDL_SetHint API.
On 2016-06-22 11:53:48 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
Created attachment 2505
Changeset to implement SDL_RPI_VIDEO_LAYER using a Hint
Using a hint for SDL_RPI_VIDEO_LAYER rather than an environment variable.
Also position the mouse layer correctly above it, in cases where it is needed.
On 2016-06-22 21:11:09 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
Created attachment 2506
SDL dispmanx layer using a Hint
Apologies, I must have attached the wrong patch on previous post.
On 2016-07-02 21:39:33 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
The name of the hint should start with "SDL_HINT_":
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Changeset implements the use of SDL_RPI_VIDEO_LAYER environment variable (sdl2-dispmanx-layer.diff, text/plain, 2016-06-21 18:26:24 +0000, 2079 bytes)Reported in version: 2.0.4
Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, ARM
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2016-06-21 18:26:24 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-06-21 19:56:18 +0000, Alex Szpakowski wrote:
On 2016-06-22 11:53:48 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-06-22 21:11:09 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-07-02 21:39:33 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
On 2016-07-04 20:03:51 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-07-18 08:29:15 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-09-16 16:28:53 +0000, Albert Casals wrote:
On 2016-10-19 06:25:12 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: