We are currently migrating Bugzilla to GitHub issues.
Any changes made to the bug tracker now will be lost, so please do not post new bugs or make changes to them.
When we're done, all bug URLs will redirect to their equivalent location on the new bug tracker.

Bug 3151 - pre-processor macros HAVE_OPENGL testshader
Summary: pre-processor macros HAVE_OPENGL testshader
Status: RESOLVED ABANDONED
Alias: None
Product: SDL
Classification: Unclassified
Component: build (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0.3
Hardware: x86_64 Mac OS X (All)
: P2 trivial
Assignee: Sam Lantinga
QA Contact: Sam Lantinga
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-10-14 20:04 UTC by scratchthedog
Modified: 2018-08-06 21:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description scratchthedog 2015-10-14 20:04:32 UTC 
pre-processor macros in xcode do not define HAVE_OPENGL - had to do it myself
using Xcode Version 7.0.1 (7A1001)
MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013)
2.7 GHz Intel Core i7
Comment 1 Ryan C. Gordon 2018-08-06 21:20:19 UTC 
Hello, and sorry if you're getting dozens of copies of this message by email.

We are closing out bugs that appear to be abandoned in some form. This can happen for lots of reasons: we couldn't reproduce it, conversation faded out, the bug was noted as fixed in a comment but we forgot to mark it resolved, the report is good but the fix is impractical, we fixed it a long time ago without realizing there was an associated report, etc.

Individually, any of these bugs might have a better resolution (such as WONTFIX or WORKSFORME or INVALID) but we've added a new resolution of ABANDONED to make this easily searchable and make it clear that it's not necessarily unreasonable to revive a given bug report.

So if this bug is still a going concern and you feel it should still be open: please feel free to reopen it! But unless you respond, we'd like to consider these bugs closed, as many of them are several years old and overwhelming our ability to prioritize recent issues.

(please note that hundred of bug reports were sorted through here, so we apologize for any human error. Just reopen the bug in that case!)

Thanks,
--ryan.