We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Reported in version: HG 2.0 Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
On 2015-06-12 08:02:01 +0000, Martin Gerhardy wrote:
Created attachment 2174 Patch that fixes the compile warnings /home/mgerhardy/dev/caveexpress/src/libs/SDL/src/core/linux/SDL_udev.c:36:1: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type static char* SDL_UDEV_LIBS[] = { "libudev.so.1", "libudev.so.0" }; /home/mgerhardy/dev/caveexpress/src/libs/SDL/src/core/linux/SDL_evdev.c:345:5: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type "/proc/self/fd/0", ^
Created attachment 2174 Patch that fixes the compile warnings
/home/mgerhardy/dev/caveexpress/src/libs/SDL/src/core/linux/SDL_udev.c:36:1: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type static char* SDL_UDEV_LIBS[] = { "libudev.so.1", "libudev.so.0" };
/home/mgerhardy/dev/caveexpress/src/libs/SDL/src/core/linux/SDL_evdev.c:345:5: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type "/proc/self/fd/0", ^
On 2015-06-12 16:05:30 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
This patch is now https://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/64f0929bcd2e, thanks! --ryan.
This patch is now https://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/64f0929bcd2e, thanks!
--ryan.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Reported in version: HG 2.0
Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2015-06-12 08:02:01 +0000, Martin Gerhardy wrote:
On 2015-06-12 16:05:30 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: