You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported in version: HG 2.1 Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2015-03-02 10:06:30 +0000, wrote:
I'm using Ubuntu Gnome 14.10, with Nvidia 550 TI and proprietary drivers.
Whenever I request SDL_GL_SetAttribute(SDL_GL_FRAMEBUFFER_SRGB_CAPABLE, 1), I get "Can't find matching GLX visual" message on trying to create the window.
Thing is, that I DO get an sRGB capable OpenGL framebuffer on the machine, even if I don't explicitly request it.
I've also tested it on Windows and got an sRGB framebuffer there regardless of the state of SDL_GL_FRAMEBUFFER_SRGB_CAPABLE flag.
This bug impairs creation of cross-platform projects that require sRGB for proper display of color.
On 2015-03-04 06:09:12 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
I remember hearing something about this. We'll look at this for 2.0.4.
--ryan.
On 2015-04-06 01:14:42 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
Created attachment 2106
reproduction case
This program fails to make a GL context on X11 with Nvidia's proprietary drivers (prints "(nil)") It works on Intel's open source drivers, at least on this machine (prints a valid pointer address for the GL context).
--ryan.
On 2015-04-06 03:42:25 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
Hmm, the Nvidia drivers don't like when you choose a visual with:
It's not clear to me where it says this attribute needs a "True" specified; other boolean items in the Mesa implementation don't do this (look for FETCH_OR_SET).
I'm confused. But at least the fix is easy now!
--ryan.
On 2015-04-06 04:15:51 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Reported in version: HG 2.1
Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2015-03-02 10:06:30 +0000, wrote:
On 2015-03-04 06:09:12 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2015-04-06 01:14:42 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2015-04-06 03:42:25 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2015-04-06 04:08:04 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2015-04-06 04:15:51 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: