You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
Reported in version: 2.0.1 Reported for operating system, platform: Mac OS X (All), x86
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2013-12-03 06:54:49 +0000, wrote:
Mac OS X 10.9 adds support for OpenGL 3.3 and 4.1 [1]. However, SDL refuses to create any context with version > 3.2 with the message "OpenGL > 3.2 is not supported on this platform".
If I create a 3.2 context, I get version 4.1. However, the error message is incorrect and misleading.
SDL should probably try to create the context and only report a failure if that fails.
On 2013-12-03 08:54:54 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
(In reply to Sam Lantinga from comment # 1)
Hey Ryan, didn't you already fix this?
I did, it's in Bug # 1942.
(In reply to BurnSpamAddress from comment # 0)
SDL should probably try to create the context and only report a failure if
that fails.
OS X doesn't offer a way to ask for an arbitrary version: just explicitly 3.2, and now with Mavericks, 4.1. The numbers happens to match up somewhat (0x0302 and 0x0401, I think), but we can't safely plug arbitrary numbers in there and expect it to work, so we have to update our list of available versions every time a new OS X comes out.
--ryan.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1942 ***
On 2013-12-03 09:06:13 +0000, Alex Szpakowski wrote:
Actually, SDL's code for requesting a 4.1 context on OS X always gives back the software renderer for me, despite the fact that I can create a 4.1 context by requesting 3.2.
The value SDL uses as an NSOpenGLPixelFormatAttribute when requesting 4.1 isn't actually officially supported, apparently.
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
Reported in version: 2.0.1
Reported for operating system, platform: Mac OS X (All), x86
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2013-12-03 06:54:49 +0000, wrote:
On 2013-12-03 07:51:29 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
On 2013-12-03 08:54:54 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2013-12-03 09:06:13 +0000, Alex Szpakowski wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: