We are currently migrating Bugzilla to GitHub issues.
Any changes made to the bug tracker now will be lost, so please do not post new bugs or make changes to them.
When we're done, all bug URLs will redirect to their equivalent location on the new bug tracker.

Bug 1631 - SDL applications bad resize screen Ubuntu 12.10 unity
Summary: SDL applications bad resize screen Ubuntu 12.10 unity
Status: RESOLVED ABANDONED
Alias: None
Product: SDL
Classification: Unclassified
Component: video (show other bugs)
Version: don't know
Hardware: x86 Linux
: P2 major
Assignee: Sam Lantinga
QA Contact: Sam Lantinga
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-10-28 02:42 UTC by tartineskiller
Modified: 2018-08-06 21:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Example of this bug with Metal Blob Solid (150.49 KB, image/png)
2012-10-28 02:42 UTC, tartineskiller 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tartineskiller 2012-10-28 02:42:37 UTC 
Created attachment 981 [details]
Example of this bug with Metal Blob Solid

I am running Ubuntu 12.10, and recently I've noticed that SDL applications in fullscreen mode doesn't resize correctly the screen : it miss a part of the screen.
This append only with Unity desktop, but I don't know if this is a Unity bug of a SDL bug...
Example with Metal Blob Solid is attached to this message.
Comment 1 Ryan C. Gordon 2018-08-06 21:20:24 UTC 
Hello, and sorry if you're getting dozens of copies of this message by email.

We are closing out bugs that appear to be abandoned in some form. This can happen for lots of reasons: we couldn't reproduce it, conversation faded out, the bug was noted as fixed in a comment but we forgot to mark it resolved, the report is good but the fix is impractical, we fixed it a long time ago without realizing there was an associated report, etc.

Individually, any of these bugs might have a better resolution (such as WONTFIX or WORKSFORME or INVALID) but we've added a new resolution of ABANDONED to make this easily searchable and make it clear that it's not necessarily unreasonable to revive a given bug report.

So if this bug is still a going concern and you feel it should still be open: please feel free to reopen it! But unless you respond, we'd like to consider these bugs closed, as many of them are several years old and overwhelming our ability to prioritize recent issues.

(please note that hundred of bug reports were sorted through here, so we apologize for any human error. Just reopen the bug in that case!)

Thanks,
--ryan.