We are currently migrating Bugzilla to GitHub issues.
Any changes made to the bug tracker now will be lost, so please do not post new bugs or make changes to them.
When we're done, all bug URLs will redirect to their equivalent location on the new bug tracker.

Bug 3206

Summary: Bresenham triangle
Product: SDL Reporter: Marcel Bakker <mna.bakker>
Component: renderAssignee: Sam Lantinga <slouken>
Status: RESOLVED ABANDONED QA Contact: Sam Lantinga <slouken>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P2    
Version: don't know   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Attachments: Bresenham triangle
Bresenham triangle include
Bresenham triangle AA
Bresenham triangle AA include

Description Marcel Bakker 2015-12-13 17:27:54 UTC
Created attachment 2336 [details]
Bresenham triangle

Attempt at a Bresenham triangle that might be of use for the Software Renderer
(SDL_RenderFillRects is used to draw a h-line as drop-in)
Comment 1 Marcel Bakker 2015-12-13 17:28:48 UTC
Created attachment 2337 [details]
Bresenham triangle include
Comment 2 Marcel Bakker 2015-12-13 17:29:36 UTC
Created attachment 2338 [details]
Bresenham triangle AA
Comment 3 Marcel Bakker 2015-12-13 17:29:58 UTC
Created attachment 2339 [details]
Bresenham triangle AA include
Comment 4 Ryan C. Gordon 2018-08-06 21:20:22 UTC
Hello, and sorry if you're getting dozens of copies of this message by email.

We are closing out bugs that appear to be abandoned in some form. This can happen for lots of reasons: we couldn't reproduce it, conversation faded out, the bug was noted as fixed in a comment but we forgot to mark it resolved, the report is good but the fix is impractical, we fixed it a long time ago without realizing there was an associated report, etc.

Individually, any of these bugs might have a better resolution (such as WONTFIX or WORKSFORME or INVALID) but we've added a new resolution of ABANDONED to make this easily searchable and make it clear that it's not necessarily unreasonable to revive a given bug report.

So if this bug is still a going concern and you feel it should still be open: please feel free to reopen it! But unless you respond, we'd like to consider these bugs closed, as many of them are several years old and overwhelming our ability to prioritize recent issues.

(please note that hundred of bug reports were sorted through here, so we apologize for any human error. Just reopen the bug in that case!)

Thanks,
--ryan.