You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported in version: HG 2.0 Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, Other
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2008-01-07 16:20:21 +0000, wrote:
I try to get a clean compile for a project using SDL. But I get warnings
from SDL headers when I use -Wold-style-cast. This is especially bad
because I plan to build the software with -Werror=old-style-cast when we
have switched over to GCC 4.2, which has that option.
But this problem can be fixed in the SDL headers. I checked out the SVN
version and made some patches. See the attached patch.
On 2008-01-07 16:21:32 +0000, wrote:
Created attachment 243
Patch against current SVN.
On 2008-11-25 11:33:41 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
Thank you very much for your patch for SDL 1.3!
Do you give me permission to release your code with SDL 1.3 and future
versions of SDL under both the LGPL and a closed-source commercial
license?
On 2008-12-28 03:59:43 +0000, wrote:
Yes, that patch can be used with any license. (It took a while to see your message here because this bugzilla is too old to have the feature to set an e-mail address (bug # 573).)
On 2009-02-16 20:58:11 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
Thanks, this is fixed in revision 4431.
On 2009-04-01 23:17:13 +0000, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
This change should be applied to the 1.2 branch, too, because the svn version SDL_net requires it.
On 2009-04-01 23:18:25 +0000, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
Created attachment 313
Patch against current SDL-1.2 branch.
On 2009-10-08 00:46:08 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
This is in for 1.2, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Reported in version: HG 2.0
Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, Other
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2008-01-07 16:20:21 +0000, wrote:
On 2008-01-07 16:21:32 +0000, wrote:
On 2008-11-25 11:33:41 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
On 2008-12-28 03:59:43 +0000, wrote:
On 2009-02-16 20:58:11 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
On 2009-04-01 23:17:13 +0000, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 2009-04-01 23:18:25 +0000, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 2009-10-08 00:46:08 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: