You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reported in version: HG 2.0 Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2012-09-03 14:31:45 +0000, wrote:
Created attachment 943
The code I have used to test SDL_DROPFILE
Hello,
I have tried to use SDL_DROPFILE, but even with
SDL_EventState(SDL_DROPFILE, SDL_ENABLE);
the SDL_DROPFILE event is not issued when I try to drop any kind of file on the window.
I have latest SDL, compiled one week ago.
I am running Archlinux x86_64 with xserver 1.12.4 and Xfce 4.10. Ask me if you need more information.
On 2012-09-04 14:24:47 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
Dropping files seems currently only implemented for Cocoa. You can check this by searching for SDL_SendDropFile in the SDL source code itself.
On 2012-09-05 06:52:26 +0000, wrote:
(In reply to comment # 1)
Dropping files seems currently only implemented for Cocoa. You can check this
by searching for SDL_SendDropFile in the SDL source code itself.
Thank you.
On 2012-09-30 05:56:09 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
Created attachment 962
patch for dropfile support on Microsoft Windows
I attached a patch which tries to implement the dropfile support for Microsoft Windows. If applied SDL_DROPFILE events should be sent for single or multiple files which are dropped on window.
The handling on Windows side is always activated (cursor will change and so on) because there is no connection between SDL_EventState() and the window setup. I assumed this additional overhead would be small and can be ignored.
On 2013-07-12 22:15:25 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
(Sorry if you get a lot of copies of this email, we're touching dozens of bug reports right now.)
Tagging a bunch of bugs as target-2.0.0, Priority 2.
This means we're in the final stretch for an official SDL 2.0.0 release! These are the bugs we really want to fix before shipping if humanly possible.
That being said, we don't promise to fix them because of this tag, we just want to make sure we don't forget to deal with them before we bless a final 2.0.0 release, and generally be organized about what we're aiming to ship.
Hopefully you'll hear more about this bug soon. If you have more information (including "this got fixed at some point, nevermind"), we would love to have you come add more information to the bug report when you have a moment.
Thanks!
--ryan.
On 2015-02-10 19:56:59 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.
These attachments are available in the static archive:
Reported in version: HG 2.0
Reported for operating system, platform: Linux, x86_64
Comments on the original bug report:
On 2012-09-03 14:31:45 +0000, wrote:
On 2012-09-04 14:24:47 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
On 2012-09-05 06:52:26 +0000, wrote:
On 2012-09-30 05:56:09 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
On 2012-09-30 11:11:25 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
On 2012-09-30 11:17:19 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:
On 2013-07-12 22:15:25 +0000, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
On 2015-02-10 19:56:59 +0000, Philipp Wiesemann wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: